Proving Lines Parallel
Turn the angle theorems around to prove parallelism
Have you ever looked at a parking lot and noticed how all those white lines stay perfectly spaced apart, never meeting no matter how far they extend? Or watched a carpenter check that a wall frame is “square” before putting up drywall? These situations involve a fundamental question in geometry: how do we know two lines are truly parallel?
In earlier lessons, you learned what happens when a transversal crosses parallel lines - you get all sorts of equal and supplementary angles. Now we are going to flip that thinking around. Instead of starting with parallel lines and discovering angle relationships, we will start with angle relationships and prove that lines must be parallel. This reversal is powerful: it gives you a way to verify parallelism and construct parallel lines with precision.
Core Concepts
The Idea of a Converse
Before diving into the theorems, let us talk about what a “converse” means in mathematics. When you have a statement like “If it is raining, then the ground is wet,” the converse flips the “if” and “then” parts: “If the ground is wet, then it is raining.”
Notice something important: the original statement might be true while its converse is false! The ground could be wet because someone turned on a sprinkler, not because it rained. In mathematics, we have to prove each statement separately.
Here is the good news: for our parallel line theorems, the converses are all true. This is not a coincidence - it reflects deep properties of Euclidean geometry.
Converse of the Corresponding Angles Theorem
Original theorem: If two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then corresponding angles are congruent.
Converse (Corresponding Angles Converse): If two lines are cut by a transversal so that corresponding angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel.
Picture this: you have two lines crossed by a transversal, and you measure a pair of corresponding angles (same position at each intersection). If those angles are equal, you can conclude the lines are parallel. This is remarkably useful - you do not need to extend the lines to infinity to check if they meet. Just measure two angles.
Converse of the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem
Alternate Interior Angles Converse: If two lines are cut by a transversal so that alternate interior angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel.
Alternate interior angles are the ones that sit on opposite sides of the transversal, between the two lines (the “interior” region). If these angles match, parallelism is guaranteed.
Converse of the Alternate Exterior Angles Theorem
Alternate Exterior Angles Converse: If two lines are cut by a transversal so that alternate exterior angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel.
Same idea, but now we are looking at angles outside the two lines, on opposite sides of the transversal. Equal alternate exterior angles mean parallel lines.
Converse of the Same-Side Interior Angles Theorem
Same-Side Interior Angles Converse: If two lines are cut by a transversal so that same-side interior angles are supplementary (add up to $180°$), then the lines are parallel.
This one is slightly different - we are not looking for equal angles, but for angles that add to $180°$. Same-side interior angles (also called co-interior angles or consecutive interior angles) are on the same side of the transversal, between the two lines. When they sum to $180°$, the lines are parallel.
The Perpendicular Transversal Theorem
Here is a powerful theorem that connects perpendicularity and parallelism:
Perpendicular Transversal Theorem: In a plane, if a transversal is perpendicular to one of two parallel lines, then it is perpendicular to the other.
And its converse gives us another way to prove lines parallel:
Perpendicular Transversal Converse: In a plane, if two lines are both perpendicular to the same transversal, then the two lines are parallel to each other.
Think about it: if line $l$ is perpendicular to transversal $t$, and line $m$ is also perpendicular to transversal $t$, then both lines make $90°$ angles with $t$. These are corresponding angles (or alternate interior angles, depending on which angles you consider), and since they are equal, lines $l$ and $m$ must be parallel.
This theorem is especially useful in construction and engineering, where perpendicularity is often easier to verify than parallelism.
Using Converses in Proofs
When writing proofs that lines are parallel, you will typically:
- Identify the transversal cutting the two lines
- Identify a pair of angles (corresponding, alternate interior, alternate exterior, or same-side interior)
- Show that the angles satisfy the appropriate condition (congruent, or supplementary for same-side interior)
- Conclude the lines are parallel by citing the appropriate converse theorem
The key is recognizing which angle pairs you have and which theorem applies.
Notation and Terminology
| Term | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Converse | A statement formed by reversing the hypothesis and conclusion | If $\angle 1 \cong \angle 2$, then $l \parallel m$ |
| Corresponding angles | Angles in the same position at each intersection | Upper-left at both crossings |
| Alternate interior angles | Interior angles on opposite sides of the transversal | One upper-left interior, one lower-right interior |
| Alternate exterior angles | Exterior angles on opposite sides of the transversal | One upper-left exterior, one lower-right exterior |
| Same-side interior angles | Interior angles on the same side of the transversal | Both on the left, between the lines |
| Supplementary | Two angles that sum to $180°$ | $110°$ and $70°$ |
| Perpendicular ($\perp$) | Meeting at a $90°$ angle | $t \perp l$ means $t$ is perpendicular to $l$ |
| Parallel ($\parallel$) | Lines that never meet, always same distance apart | $l \parallel m$ |
| Transversal | A line that crosses two or more other lines | The line cutting through $l$ and $m$ |
| Perpendicular transversal | A transversal perpendicular to one or both lines it crosses | If $t \perp l$, then $t$ is a perpendicular transversal to $l$ |
Examples
Lines $a$ and $b$ are cut by transversal $t$. For each situation, state which theorem proves that $a \parallel b$.
a) $\angle 1$ and $\angle 5$ are corresponding angles, and $\angle 1 \cong \angle 5$. b) $\angle 3$ and $\angle 6$ are alternate interior angles, and $\angle 3 \cong \angle 6$. c) $\angle 4$ and $\angle 5$ are same-side interior angles, and $m\angle 4 + m\angle 5 = 180°$.
Solution:
a) Since corresponding angles are congruent, lines $a$ and $b$ are parallel by the Corresponding Angles Converse.
b) Since alternate interior angles are congruent, lines $a$ and $b$ are parallel by the Alternate Interior Angles Converse.
c) Since same-side interior angles are supplementary, lines $a$ and $b$ are parallel by the Same-Side Interior Angles Converse.
Each situation gives us enough information to conclude parallelism, just using different angle relationships.
Write the converse of the following theorem:
“If two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then alternate exterior angles are congruent.”
Solution:
To form the converse, we swap the hypothesis (the “if” part) and the conclusion (the “then” part).
Original:
- Hypothesis: Two parallel lines are cut by a transversal
- Conclusion: Alternate exterior angles are congruent
Converse:
- Hypothesis: Two lines are cut by a transversal so that alternate exterior angles are congruent
- Conclusion: The lines are parallel
Written as a full statement:
“If two lines are cut by a transversal so that alternate exterior angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel.”
This is the Alternate Exterior Angles Converse, and it is indeed a true theorem in Euclidean geometry.
Given: $\angle 1 \cong \angle 3$
Prove: $l \parallel m$
(Angles $1$ and $2$ are a linear pair at the intersection of $l$ and transversal $t$. Angle $3$ is at the intersection of $m$ and $t$, on the same side as $\angle 2$, between lines $l$ and $m$.)
Solution:
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| 1. $\angle 1 \cong \angle 3$ | Given |
| 2. $\angle 1$ and $\angle 2$ are supplementary | Linear Pair Postulate |
| 3. $m\angle 1 + m\angle 2 = 180°$ | Definition of supplementary angles |
| 4. $m\angle 3 + m\angle 2 = 180°$ | Substitution (from statements 1 and 3) |
| 5. $\angle 3$ and $\angle 2$ are supplementary | Definition of supplementary angles |
| 6. $l \parallel m$ | Same-Side Interior Angles Converse |
Explanation:
We started with the given information that $\angle 1 \cong \angle 3$. Since $\angle 1$ and $\angle 2$ form a linear pair, they are supplementary. By substituting $\angle 3$ for $\angle 1$ (since they are congruent), we showed that $\angle 3$ and $\angle 2$ are also supplementary. Since $\angle 3$ and $\angle 2$ are same-side interior angles that are supplementary, the lines are parallel.
Lines $p$ and $q$ are cut by transversal $r$. The measures of two alternate interior angles are $(3x + 15)°$ and $(5x - 21)°$.
a) For what value of $x$ would lines $p$ and $q$ be parallel? b) What are the angle measures when the lines are parallel?
Solution:
a) For lines to be parallel, alternate interior angles must be congruent (by the Alternate Interior Angles Converse). So we set the expressions equal:
$$3x + 15 = 5x - 21$$
Solve for $x$: $$15 + 21 = 5x - 3x$$ $$36 = 2x$$ $$x = 18$$
b) Substitute $x = 18$ into either expression: $$3(18) + 15 = 54 + 15 = 69°$$
Let us verify with the other expression: $$5(18) - 21 = 90 - 21 = 69°$$
Both angles measure $69°$, confirming they are congruent.
Conclusion: When $x = 18$, the alternate interior angles are both $69°$, making the angles congruent and the lines parallel.
Given: $\overline{AB} \parallel \overline{CD}$ and $\overline{AB} \parallel \overline{EF}$
Prove: $\overline{CD} \parallel \overline{EF}$
(Lines $AB$, $CD$, and $EF$ are all cut by a transversal $t$.)
Solution:
This proof uses the transitive-like property of parallel lines: if two lines are each parallel to a third line, they are parallel to each other.
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| 1. $\overline{AB} \parallel \overline{CD}$ | Given |
| 2. $\overline{AB} \parallel \overline{EF}$ | Given |
| 3. Let $\angle 1$ be a corresponding angle at the intersection of $t$ and $\overline{AB}$, and $\angle 2$ be the corresponding angle at $t$ and $\overline{CD}$ | Construction/Definition |
| 4. $\angle 1 \cong \angle 2$ | Corresponding Angles Theorem (from statement 1) |
| 5. Let $\angle 3$ be the corresponding angle at the intersection of $t$ and $\overline{EF}$ | Construction/Definition |
| 6. $\angle 1 \cong \angle 3$ | Corresponding Angles Theorem (from statement 2) |
| 7. $\angle 2 \cong \angle 3$ | Transitive Property of Congruence (from 4 and 6) |
| 8. $\overline{CD} \parallel \overline{EF}$ | Corresponding Angles Converse |
Explanation:
The key insight is that both $\overline{CD}$ and $\overline{EF}$ create congruent corresponding angles with $\overline{AB}$. By the transitive property, the corresponding angles at $\overline{CD}$ and $\overline{EF}$ must be congruent to each other. This lets us apply the Corresponding Angles Converse to conclude that $\overline{CD} \parallel \overline{EF}$.
This theorem (transitivity of parallelism) is frequently used in geometry proofs and real-world applications.
Key Properties and Rules
The Four Converses for Proving Parallel Lines
Corresponding Angles Converse: If $\angle 1 \cong \angle 5$ (corresponding), then $l \parallel m$.
Alternate Interior Angles Converse: If $\angle 3 \cong \angle 6$ (alternate interior), then $l \parallel m$.
Alternate Exterior Angles Converse: If $\angle 1 \cong \angle 8$ (alternate exterior), then $l \parallel m$.
Same-Side Interior Angles Converse: If $m\angle 3 + m\angle 5 = 180°$ (same-side interior supplementary), then $l \parallel m$.
Perpendicular and Parallel Relationships
Perpendicular Transversal Theorem: If $l \parallel m$ and $t \perp l$, then $t \perp m$.
Two Perpendiculars Theorem: If $t \perp l$ and $t \perp m$, then $l \parallel m$.
Transitivity of Parallel Lines
If $l \parallel m$ and $m \parallel n$, then $l \parallel n$.
(Two lines parallel to the same line are parallel to each other.)
Quick Reference: What to Look For
| If you find… | And they are… | Then conclude… | By… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corresponding angles | Congruent | Lines parallel | Corresponding Angles Converse |
| Alternate interior angles | Congruent | Lines parallel | Alternate Interior Angles Converse |
| Alternate exterior angles | Congruent | Lines parallel | Alternate Exterior Angles Converse |
| Same-side interior angles | Supplementary | Lines parallel | Same-Side Interior Angles Converse |
| Both lines | Perpendicular to same transversal | Lines parallel | Two Perpendiculars Theorem |
Real-World Applications
Construction: Ensuring Walls Are Parallel
When builders construct a house, they need walls to be parallel. One common technique uses the principle behind the Perpendicular Transversal Converse: if both walls are perpendicular to the floor (checked with a level), then the walls must be parallel to each other. Carpenters also use chalk lines and measuring equal distances at multiple points, essentially verifying that corresponding angles with a transversal are equal.
Engineering: Parallel Components
In mechanical engineering, many machines rely on parallel rails, tracks, or guides. A CNC machine, for instance, needs its cutting head to move along rails that are perfectly parallel. Engineers verify parallelism by measuring angles at multiple points along a transversal reference line. If the angles match, the rails are parallel - a direct application of the Corresponding Angles Converse.
Art: Perspective Drawing
Artists who draw in perspective use the concept of parallel lines extensively. In reality, parallel lines (like railroad tracks) appear to converge at a vanishing point. But when creating the illusion of 3D space on a 2D canvas, artists use the angle relationships of parallel lines cut by transversals to maintain consistency. Understanding these converses helps artists check their work: if certain angles should be equal for lines to “read” as parallel, they can verify the drawing is accurate.
Sports Field Marking
When marking a football field, soccer pitch, or running track, groundskeepers must create parallel lines. They often use a method based on the Two Perpendiculars Theorem: stretch a string perpendicular to the sideline at one end, then perpendicular at the other end, and the yard lines will be parallel. This is much easier than trying to directly verify that lines never meet.
Railroad Track Construction
Railroad tracks must be parallel to prevent derailment. Track workers use gauges (fixed-width tools) placed at regular intervals along the track. If the gauge fits perfectly at each interval, the corresponding angles between the gauge and each rail are congruent, proving the rails are parallel. This is the Corresponding Angles Converse in action.
Self-Test Problems
Problem 1: Lines $j$ and $k$ are cut by transversal $t$. If a pair of alternate interior angles measure $47°$ each, are lines $j$ and $k$ parallel? Which theorem justifies your answer?
Show Answer
Yes, lines $j$ and $k$ are parallel.
Since the alternate interior angles are congruent (both measure $47°$), we can conclude that $j \parallel k$ by the Alternate Interior Angles Converse.
Problem 2: Write the converse of this theorem: “If two parallel lines are cut by a transversal, then same-side interior angles are supplementary.”
Show Answer
Converse: “If two lines are cut by a transversal so that same-side interior angles are supplementary, then the lines are parallel.”
This is the Same-Side Interior Angles Converse, and it is a valid theorem for proving parallelism.
Problem 3: Lines $m$ and $n$ are cut by transversal $p$. Two same-side interior angles measure $(2x + 40)°$ and $(3x + 15)°$. For what value of $x$ are lines $m$ and $n$ parallel?
Show Answer
For lines to be parallel, same-side interior angles must be supplementary (sum to $180°$):
$$(2x + 40) + (3x + 15) = 180$$ $$5x + 55 = 180$$ $$5x = 125$$ $$x = 25$$
Check: When $x = 25$:
- First angle: $2(25) + 40 = 50 + 40 = 90°$
- Second angle: $3(25) + 15 = 75 + 15 = 90°$
- Sum: $90° + 90° = 180°$ ✓
Lines $m$ and $n$ are parallel when $x = 25$.
Problem 4: Line $t$ is perpendicular to line $a$. Line $t$ is also perpendicular to line $b$. What can you conclude about lines $a$ and $b$? State the theorem that supports your conclusion.
Show Answer
Conclusion: Lines $a$ and $b$ are parallel ($a \parallel b$).
Theorem: Two Perpendiculars Theorem (or Perpendicular Transversal Converse)
If two lines are both perpendicular to the same transversal, then the two lines are parallel to each other.
Problem 5: Given that $\angle 1$ and $\angle 2$ are corresponding angles formed by lines $r$ and $s$ with transversal $v$, and $m\angle 1 = 65°$ while $m\angle 2 = 65°$, prove that $r \parallel s$ using a two-column proof.
Show Answer
| Statement | Reason |
|---|---|
| 1. $\angle 1$ and $\angle 2$ are corresponding angles | Given |
| 2. $m\angle 1 = 65°$ | Given |
| 3. $m\angle 2 = 65°$ | Given |
| 4. $m\angle 1 = m\angle 2$ | Substitution (or Transitive Property) |
| 5. $\angle 1 \cong \angle 2$ | Definition of congruent angles |
| 6. $r \parallel s$ | Corresponding Angles Converse |
Problem 6: In a diagram, $\overline{WX} \parallel \overline{YZ}$. A transversal creates an angle of $118°$ with $\overline{WX}$. What is the measure of the corresponding angle at $\overline{YZ}$? What about the alternate interior angle?
Show Answer
Corresponding angle: $118°$
When parallel lines are cut by a transversal, corresponding angles are congruent. So the corresponding angle at $\overline{YZ}$ also measures $118°$.
Alternate interior angle: $118°$
Alternate interior angles are also congruent when lines are parallel. So any alternate interior angle would also measure $118°$.
Note: The same-side interior angle would be supplementary, measuring $180° - 118° = 62°$.
Problem 7: A construction worker needs to verify that two wall studs are parallel. She places a straightedge (transversal) across both studs and measures the angles. At the first stud, the angle is $90°$. At the second stud, the angle is $89°$. Are the studs parallel? Explain.
Show Answer
No, the studs are not perfectly parallel.
For the studs to be parallel, the corresponding angles would need to be congruent. Since $90° \neq 89°$, the corresponding angles are not congruent, and we cannot conclude the lines are parallel by the Corresponding Angles Converse.
In practical terms, the studs are very close to parallel (only $1°$ off), which might be acceptable depending on the construction tolerances. But mathematically, they are not parallel.
Summary
-
A converse reverses the “if” and “then” parts of a statement. The converses of the parallel line theorems are all true and give us ways to prove lines are parallel.
-
Corresponding Angles Converse: If corresponding angles are congruent, the lines are parallel.
-
Alternate Interior Angles Converse: If alternate interior angles are congruent, the lines are parallel.
-
Alternate Exterior Angles Converse: If alternate exterior angles are congruent, the lines are parallel.
-
Same-Side Interior Angles Converse: If same-side interior angles are supplementary (sum to $180°$), the lines are parallel.
-
Perpendicular Transversal Converse: If two lines are both perpendicular to the same transversal, they are parallel to each other.
-
Transitivity: If two lines are each parallel to a third line, they are parallel to each other.
-
In proofs, identify the transversal, determine which angle pair you have, verify the appropriate condition (congruent or supplementary), and cite the correct converse theorem.
-
These converses have practical applications in construction, engineering, art, and anywhere precise parallelism matters. Rather than checking if lines “eventually meet” (impossible!), we verify angle relationships instead.